Compare Occupations

SUMMARY
27%
Low Risk
16%
Minimal Risk
33%
Low Risk
29%
Low Risk
28%
Low Risk
JOB SCORE 5.7/10 6.7/10 5.4/10 6.9/10 6.3/10
POLLING
57%
(Moderate Risk, Based on 91 votes)
56%
(Moderate Risk, Based on 622 votes)
81%
(Imminent Risk, Based on 453 votes)
37%
(Low Risk, Based on 417 votes)
57%
(Moderate Risk, Based on 764 votes)
GROWTH
by year 2034
8.7%
8.2%
33.5%
8.7%
28.5%
WAGES
$135,980
or $65.37 per hour
$108,970
or $52.39 per hour
$112,590
or $54.13 per hour
$103,790
or $49.89 per hour
$124,910
or $60.05 per hour
VOLUME
as of 2024
64,770
439,380
233,440
497,800
179,430
SNOWFLAKE [?] The Snowflake is a visual summary of the five badges: Automation Risk (calculated), Risk (polled), Growth, Wages and Volume. It gives you an instant snapshot of an occupations profile. The colour of the Snowflake relates to its size. The better the occupation scores in relation to others, the larger and greener the Snowflake becomes. Snowflake diagram for Data Warehousing Specialists Snowflake diagram for Computer Systems Engineers/Architects Snowflake diagram for Business Intelligence Analysts Snowflake diagram for Computer Systems Analysts Snowflake diagram for Information Security Analysts
DESCRIPTION Design, model, or implement corporate data warehousing activities. Program and configure warehouses of database information and provide support to warehouse users. Design and develop solutions to complex applications problems, system administration issues, or network concerns. Perform systems management and integration functions. Produce financial and market intelligence by querying data repositories and generating periodic reports. Devise methods for identifying data patterns and trends in available information sources. Analyze science, engineering, business, and other data processing problems to develop and implement solutions to complex applications problems, system administration issues, or network concerns. Perform systems management and integration functions, improve existing computer systems, and review computer system capabilities, workflow, and schedule limitations. May analyze or recommend commercially available software. Plan, implement, upgrade, or monitor security measures for the protection of computer networks and information. Assess system vulnerabilities for security risks and propose and implement risk mitigation strategies. May ensure appropriate security controls are in place that will safeguard digital files and vital electronic infrastructure. May respond to computer security breaches and viruses.

Compare Occupations Side by Side

Curious how automation and AI could affect your career? Our comparison tool lets you view two or more jobs side by side, helping you quickly spot differences in risk level, pay, growth, and popularity. All of this is based on a mix of academic research, user polling, and official labour data.

Automation Risk

Each occupation shows a probability of automation. A higher score means machines and algorithms are more likely to take over the role in the future.

Job Score

A quick summary of how a job performs overall — factoring in wages, growth, volume, and automation risk. It’s a handy way to see the bigger picture at a glance.

Polling Data

Thousands of visitors cast their votes on how “automatable” each job feels. These community insights are shown alongside the calculated probabilities.

Growth & Wages

See how fast each occupation is projected to grow and what people earn on average. High wages don’t always mean high security — automation risk still matters.

Volume of Workers

Explore how many people currently work in each occupation and in which year the data was recorded. Popularity can affect how disruptive automation will be for the wider economy.

The Snowflake Diagram

Each snowflake visualises the balance between automation risk, wages, growth, and job volume. Bigger and greener areas mean stronger performance in that dimension.

Use this comparison page to research careers, guide students, or simply explore the future of work. All data is regularly updated to keep the results relevant.