Chief Executives

Executives are easily replaced as any kind of data analysis position. These spots are the most expensive per person positions and contribute the least to the success of the business. Easy fat to cut.

ai is very good at day to day management of companies on a large scale while there'll still probably be a cel so the government and shareholders have someone to blame if things go wrong the teams of executive will shrink massively

A chief have their own taste, while ai only have calculating power and a bunch of 1 and 0s. AI is based on human resources and knowledge. They might do well copying repetitive jobs, such as telemakers. However, when we are talking about meals, it is a fundamental part in our living. People have to eat everyday. AI might have the advantage of controlling the stability of meal quality, but everyone have their different taste. To make everyone happy, a chef that is creative, skillful and professional can solve the issue easily. They have experienced everything. Ai doesn't. They are machines, and chefs touches water, fire and greases that can easily break a machine. There are way too many variables in cooking, for a decade, AI will not likely to yake away their jobs, only if people recognise pre-cooked meals, that will be another story.

I think AI can certainly replace most of what the average CEO does day-to-day as far as rote work goes, but I don’t think these jobs will be 100% automated because CEOs have a disproportionate amount of influence in politics, and I am more than willing to bet CEOs have enough self-preservation instincts to not want to automate themselves out of high paying jobs.

Overall I suspect that CEOs will work together with politicians to tinker with the legal and political environment in a way that ensures everyone else’s job is automated before any risk comes to their own.

a robot cant do the job like a human can, they cant connect with people like huamans do and to be a successful CEO its about who you know not what you know therefore a robot would be useless

The core role of a CEO is to assess the market and their company position within it and allocate resources to maximise increase in revenue and stock value.

A.I excels at this kind of analysis and decision making. Very few CEO's engage with their staff on a personal level, something AI's are bad at doing.

In short: CEO's should be busy making hay, the sky looks overcast.

Not at all, there aren't any options to replace them cause it's not about manage accounts and finance but more than leadership, creativity which can't be done by robots rather than human itself.

It's already had two instances of full automation, and both significantly out perform their human counterparts.

As the primary job requirements are analyzing the market and networking, skills that computers hold significantly in advantage over humans, it's unlikely this job will last much longer.

A.i are generally better at thinking far ahead even if right now they still lag behind in negotiations

The CEO position is highly paid due to the large amount of responsibility. AI can make decisions without being influenced outside of Data. No one is afraid of offending an impartial AI CEO so the data given is highest quality. AI is perfect to replace CEOs.

1) I feel it is probable, yet dreadful, that many low-risk jobs with moderate to high pay rates will quickly become oversaturated. These jobs can then be easily replaced by others who accept progressively lower rates of pay.

2) The high-risk jobs will soon become automated and no longer exist.

3) Job growth would be surpassed by the oversaturation of remaining jobs. Few new job fields will open or boom, except perhaps, the robotics field.

4) This could likely lead to mass unemployment and under-employment, resulting in poverty. Companies may then have few buyers for their products and services.

Because it is a more creative position, in which you must reason and make decisions, talk to people and manage personnel, you must create a bond

I think in the future, most of the work on entrepreneur will be done by humans. For example, I think humans will still be in charge of creative thinking or creating new inventions. But I think artificial intelligence can manage accounting, finance, and staff.

CEOs lead companies and human intelligence is certainly required. Moreover CEOs are in charge and they will never allow their jobs to be replaced.

When your talking about a chief executive officer it's someone starting his/her own business. Why would a robot take their place as the chief executive officer of the business it's so silly. But your talking about '' Super intelligence '' then because in that time when ASI arises they could become ceo's and get their own business started. That's fine but that doesn't mean humans will never start a business as ceo's. I'd say a robot would work for the CEO of the company.

I think that chief executive require people and social skills that robots can no possess, and I believe that no robot is intelligent or advanced enough to handle this role.

robots just won't be able to perform these tasks nearly as goood and efficently as humans

Robots will not be able to replace human beings because they maintain a good relationship.

Anyone who thinks they can't be replaced by a robot is delusional. That said, when the times comes, maybe the executives can learn to code?

Excelente e muito criativo