Automation Risk
Each occupation shows a probability of automation. A higher score means machines and algorithms are more likely to take over the role in the future.
| SUMMARY |
37%
Low Risk
|
10%
Minimal Risk
|
25%
Low Risk
|
26%
Low Risk
|
24%
Low Risk
|
21%
Low Risk
|
| JOB SCORE | 3.8/10 | 6.5/10 | 5.4/10 | 4.2/10 | 4.8/10 | 7.4/10 |
| POLLING |
55%
(Moderate Risk,
Based on 521 votes)
|
45%
(Moderate Risk,
Based on 21 votes)
|
There hasn't been enough votes on this occupation yet
|
33%
(Low Risk,
Based on 22 votes)
|
35%
(Low Risk,
Based on 202 votes)
|
There hasn't been enough votes on this occupation yet
|
|
GROWTH
by year 2034
|
0.4%
|
3.0%
|
2.7%
|
-2.2%
|
-7.8%
|
4.5%
|
| WAGES |
$38,370
or $18.45 per hour
|
$81,270
or $39.07 per hour
|
$58,610
or $28.18 per hour
|
$57,050
or $27.43 per hour
|
$57,970
or $27.87 per hour
|
$136,550
or $65.64 per hour
|
|
VOLUME
as of 2024
|
1,241,770
|
1,128,200
|
70,310
|
16,910
|
365,380
|
630,980
|
| SNOWFLAKE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DESCRIPTION | Guard, patrol, or monitor premises to prevent theft, violence, or infractions of rules. May operate x-ray and metal detector equipment. | Conduct security assessments for organizations, and design security systems and processes. May specialize in areas such as physical security or the safety of employees and facilities. | Directly supervise and coordinate activities of security workers and security guards. | Maintain order in courts of law. | Guard inmates in penal or rehabilitative institutions in accordance with established regulations and procedures. May guard prisoners in transit between jail, courtroom, prison, or other point. Includes deputy sheriffs and police who spend the majority of their time guarding prisoners in correctional institutions. | Plan and direct policies, procedures, or systems to prevent the loss of assets. Determine risk exposure or potential liability, and develop risk control measures. |
Curious how automation and AI could affect your career? Our comparison tool lets you view two or more jobs side by side, helping you quickly spot differences in risk level, pay, growth, and popularity. All of this is based on a mix of academic research, user polling, and official labour data.
Each occupation shows a probability of automation. A higher score means machines and algorithms are more likely to take over the role in the future.
A quick summary of how a job performs overall — factoring in wages, growth, volume, and automation risk. It’s a handy way to see the bigger picture at a glance.
Thousands of visitors cast their votes on how “automatable” each job feels. These community insights are shown alongside the calculated probabilities.
See how fast each occupation is projected to grow and what people earn on average. High wages don’t always mean high security — automation risk still matters.
Explore how many people currently work in each occupation and in which year the data was recorded. Popularity can affect how disruptive automation will be for the wider economy.
Each snowflake visualises the balance between automation risk, wages, growth, and job volume. Bigger and greener areas mean stronger performance in that dimension.
Use this comparison page to research careers, guide students, or simply explore the future of work. All data is regularly updated to keep the results relevant.