General Internal Medicine Physicians

Minimal Risk
Low High

Explore safer careers (1)

Lower estimated automation risk

Hospitalists
2% automation risk | Minimal Risk
More jobs
7.7 pts lower View career
Why it fits

Directly reuses adult diagnosis, medication decisions, care coordination, handoffs, and acute disease knowledge.

Alternative careers

Related career paths that build on similar skills and experience

Epidemiologists
9% automation risk | Minimal Risk
Higher growth
0.6 pts lower View career
Why it fits

Transfers prevention, disease patterns, outcomes, public health data, and population risk thinking.

Medical and Health Services Managers
10% automation risk | Minimal Risk
Higher growth More jobs
View career
Why it fits

Fits physicians moving into clinic operations, staffing, quality, compliance, access, and patient flow.

Health Specialties Teachers, Postsecondary
10% automation risk | Minimal Risk
Higher growth More jobs
Similar risk View career
Why it fits

Uses internal medicine expertise to teach diagnosis, pharmacology, clinical reasoning, and patient care.


Share your results with friends and family.

Occupation snapshot

What does this snowflake show?
The Snowflake is a visual summary of the five badges: Automation Risk (calculated), Risk (polled), Growth, Wages and Volume. It gives you an instant snapshot of an occupations profile. The colour of the Snowflake relates to its size. The better the occupation scores in relation to others, the larger and greener the Snowflake becomes.
JOB SCORE
7.7/10
What's this?
Job Score (higher is better):

We rate jobs using four factors. These are:

- Chance of being automated
- Job growth
- Wages
- Volume of available positions

These are some key things to think about when job hunting.

Risk & user votes

Calculated automation risk

10% (Minimal Risk)

Minimal Risk (0-20%): This occupation appears difficult to replace end-to-end with current or near-future automation, including AI software and robotics. Roles in this range usually depend on human judgement, creativity, care, leadership, specialist expertise, or adapting to messy real-world situations. AI and machines may still change parts of the work, but the occupation is likely to remain a distinct human role.

More information on what this score is, and how it is calculated is available here.

Human strengths important in this job

These are human abilities and work contexts that are important in this occupation. They may help explain why parts of the role are harder to replace end-to-end, but they are not the only inputs into the automation score.

Assisting and caring for others

Very important
Why this matters
Provide hands-on help, emotional support, or personal care to people—work that depends on empathy, trust, and responding to individual needs in the moment.
Jobs that also use this strength

Decision-making and problem solving

Very important
Why this matters
Analyze information, weigh tradeoffs, and choose the best solution—especially when situations are ambiguous, high-stakes, or have real-world consequences.
Jobs that also use this strength

Psychology knowledge

Very important
Why this matters
Understanding human behavior, motivation, and individual differences to assess needs, respond appropriately, and support behavior change or mental health.
Jobs that also use this strength

Education and training expertise

Very important
Why this matters
Designing and delivering instruction—adapting lessons to different learners and measuring whether training actually works.
Jobs that also use this strength

Working directly with the public

Quite important
Why this matters
The job involves face-to-face interaction with customers, clients, or guests—answering questions, handling requests, and managing service situations in real time. Roles with frequent public interaction are harder to replace end-to-end because they rely on trust, communication, and adapting to unpredictable human needs.
Jobs that also use this strength
Show 5 more strengths

Persuasion

Quite important
Why this matters
Influencing people to change their minds or behavior through conversation, trust, and negotiation.
Jobs that also use this strength

Thinking creatively

Quite important
Why this matters
Coming up with original ideas and designs—creating new concepts, products, systems, or artistic work. This kind of open-ended invention and taste-based judgment is harder to automate end-to-end than routine, rule-based tasks.
Jobs that also use this strength

Coordinating others’ work

Quite important
Why this matters
Bringing people together, assigning tasks, and keeping a group aligned so work gets done.
Jobs that also use this strength

Consulting and advising others

Quite important
Why this matters
Provide guidance and expert advice to managers or teams on technical, system, or process decisions—explaining options, tradeoffs, and recommended actions.
Jobs that also use this strength

Active learning

Quite important
Why this matters
Keeps learning from new information and applying it to make better decisions now and in the future, especially when situations change.
Jobs that also use this strength

What users think

Based on 379 votes

33% chance of full automation within the next two decades

Our visitors have voted there's a low chance this occupation will be automated. This assessment is further supported by the calculated automation risk level, which estimates 10% chance of automation.

What do you think the risk of automation is?

What is the likelihood that General Internal Medicine Physicians will be replaced by robots or artificial intelligence within the next 20 years?

Sentiment

Based on user votes over time

View sentiment trend

How opinions have changed over time

Pay & outlook

Wages

Very high paid relative to other professions

In 2024, the median annual wage for General Internal Medicine Physicians was $236,350 ($114 per hour).

The median annual wage for General Internal Medicine Physicians was 377.5% higher than the national median annual wage, which stood at $49,500.

View wage trend

Wages over time

* Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics

Growth

Moderate growth relative to other professions

The number of 'General Internal Medicine Physicians' job openings is expected to rise 3.3% by 2034

View employment trend

Total employment, and estimated job openings

* Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period between 2023 and 2033
Updated projections are due 09-2025.

Volume

Moderate range of job opportunities compared to other professions

As of 2024 there were 66,640 people employed as 'General Internal Medicine Physicians' within the United States.

This represents around < 0.001% of the employed workforce across the country

Put another way, around 1 in 2 thousand people are employed as 'General Internal Medicine Physicians'.

People also viewed

Lawyers Computer Programmers Actors Pharmacists Accountants and Auditors

What people are saying (10)

Leave a comment
Im wrong
27 Mar 2026 14:38
In 2022, people says AI cannot do anything else than just prompting. Now, we have videoes, agents, or even ai taxis. If you are talking that AI cannot detect lies. Trust me, it will do it much faster than you think. As for now, average AI's IQ is already higher than the world average human intelligence. If the AI trends is not popping in the next few years, then it will be possible gradually... btw even humans are not 100% accurate. So why we judge that AI is not reliable just because it makes errors?
Barez (Highly likely)
14 Jun 2022 09:28
Because robots can't distinguish lies from people who pretend to have a disease, it becomes crucial. The type of lie that the patient themselves believe to be true is the most important thing for human intelligence to recognize.
Q
13 Apr 2025 11:59
wouldnt that mean that its unlikely
Kat (No chance)
11 Oct 2024 21:20
I wouldn’t trust a robot with my medical care. One error and I’m dead.
Wael
05 Aug 2023 03:30
it's human life on the edge not a reversible programing errors so we need a DOCTOR decisions in these cases
Aditya (Moderate)
22 Sep 2024 21:35
Lots of diagnoses are done by tests and investigations and can be increasingly managed by a single person.
Luxy John
14 Jul 2023 08:58
AI replacing doctor: Risk Low
AI replacing a huge number of doctors: High
AI automating jobs of many doctors : HIGH

So what do doctors do that AI can do ?
1. type up clinic letters by dictation or typing themselves: EASILY AUTOMATED
2. prescribing standard medications for a disease ONCE DIAGNOSED: easy to automate
3. referring to other specialities / involving other specialties if test results abnormal: EASILY AUTOMATED
4. have frequent tea coffee breaks and date lovely nurses: difficult to automate.......
5. DIAGNOSE ILLNESS......if a monkey can put all the data into the computer by talking to a patient, then the AI will outperform the doctor and suggest the TOP THREE BEST POSSIBILE/ LIKELY diagnosis... IT CAN PRINT OUT blood requests and scans for all those diseases instantly and forward it to all departments. ... and once the data comes back the final diagnosis can be confirmed....

BUT TAKING ONE LOOK AT A PATIENT AND SAYING YOU ARE OK, you can go home, no medications needed....NO WAY YOU CAN AUTOMATE THAT.....everyone and everything that walks will be taken blood out of and scanned to death ... life will become slowed down by all the testing.. but hey, the tests will be faster right? we will have more CT scans and MRIs or even better scanners for everyone at their own home right? well if so, yes, doctors will have to be renamed to HEALTH AI MANAGERS
wolf
24 Jan 2023 21:18
The social aspects of this job make it safe
T (No chance)
28 Mar 2022 13:38
Robots cant think like humans
A coder from Google (Highly likely)
14 Apr 2022 23:00
I don't know who's answering these polls...

We literally have so many AI databases that can help identify illnesses from symptoms and biostatistics. It's a project that's being worked on by many tech companies. Even doctors are already using this.

There exist remote surgeon robots that allow surgeons to perform surgery without being physically present. The only reason there's a human there is because we are too afraid of AI decision-making for liability issues.

There's no technical barrier to a fully automated single-purpose AI replacing specialist doctors slowly.

Leave a reply about this occupation
0/8000

Job description

Diagnose and provide nonsurgical treatment for a wide range of diseases and injuries of internal organ systems. Provide care mainly for adults and adolescents, and are based primarily in an outpatient care setting.

O*NET-SOC code: 29-1216.00