Paralegals and Legal Assistants
Explore safer careers (5)
Lower estimated automation risk
Why it fits
Uses legal records, version control, retention rules, metadata, document workflows, and accuracy standards.
Why it fits
Uses contracts, employment rules, grievance files, research, documentation, negotiations, and confidentiality.
Why it fits
Transfers legal research, submissions, documentation, policy tracking, evidence organization, and regulatory deadlines.
Why it fits
Fits paralegals with investigative work using records, interviews, timelines, evidence, and written case summaries.
Why it fits
Uses rule interpretation, records, investigations, documentation, deadlines, evidence review, and written findings.
Occupation snapshot
What does this snowflake show?
What's this?
We rate jobs using four factors. These are:
- Chance of being automated
- Job growth
- Wages
- Volume of available positions
These are some key things to think about when job hunting.
Risk & user votes
Calculated automation risk
Moderate Risk (41-60%): This occupation may be meaningfully affected by automation. Some parts of the role may be suitable for AI, software, or robotics, while others still rely on human skill, judgement, trust, or real-world context. People in this range may benefit from building skills that complement automation and reduce replacement risk.
More information on what this score is, and how it is calculated is available here.
Human strengths important in this job
These are human abilities and work contexts that are important in this occupation. They may help explain why parts of the role are harder to replace end-to-end, but they are not the only inputs into the automation score.
Communicating with people outside the organization
Very importantWhy this matters
Social perceptiveness
Quite importantWhy this matters
Decision-making and problem solving
Quite importantWhy this matters
Active learning
Quite importantWhy this matters
What users think
Based on 282 votes
Our visitors have voted that it's probable this occupation will be automated. This assessment is further supported by the calculated automation risk level, which estimates 53% chance of automation.
What do you think the risk of automation is?
What is the likelihood that Paralegals and Legal Assistants will be replaced by robots or artificial intelligence within the next 20 years?
Sentiment
Based on user votes over time
View sentiment trend
How opinions have changed over time
Pay & outlook
Wages
In 2024, the median annual wage for Paralegals and Legal Assistants was $61,010 ($29 per hour).
The median annual wage for Paralegals and Legal Assistants was 23.3% higher than the national median annual wage, which stood at $49,500.
View wage trend
Wages over time
Growth
The number of 'Paralegals and Legal Assistants' job openings is expected to rise 0.2% by 2034
View employment trend
Total employment, and estimated job openings
Updated projections are due 09-2025.
Volume
As of 2024 there were 367,220 people employed as 'Paralegals and Legal Assistants' within the United States.
This represents around 0.24% of the employed workforce across the country
Put another way, around 1 in 419 people are employed as 'Paralegals and Legal Assistants'.
People also viewed
Job description
Assist lawyers by investigating facts, preparing legal documents, or researching legal precedent. Conduct research to support a legal proceeding, to formulate a defense, or to initiate legal action.
O*NET-SOC code: 23-2011.00
What people are saying (9)
A robot cannot tell when a client or opposing counsel is lying to it. Also a lot of times we have to poke and prod into people’s lives and ask them questions they don’t want to answer or tell anyone. This type of questioning I don’t believe a robot would be able to know to poke deeper into someone’s life or question why. If someone said no to a question a robot would take that at face value and not pry deeper to get the truth. So I think that my job will be safe as long as there are still attorneys practicing law.
GPT often wrong about law, getting lawyers into actual trouble
GPT draws on older information-- law is constantly evolving and older sources cannot be counted on
Reply to comment