Photographic Process Workers and Processing Machine Operators

High Risk
Low High

Explore safer careers (5)

Lower estimated automation risk

Photographers
28% automation risk | Low Risk
Higher growth More jobs
43.2 pts lower View career
Why it fits

Uses image quality, exposure, media handling, retouching, and print delivery knowledge.

Film and Video Editors
41% automation risk | Moderate Risk
Pays better Higher growth
30.7 pts lower View career
Why it fits

Uses digital media editing, visual sequencing, file workflows, and image-quality judgment with software training.

Desktop Publishers
34% automation risk | Low Risk
Pays better
36.9 pts lower View career
Why it fits

Applies image layout, file preparation, color and print readiness, and detail checking.

Graphic Designers
34% automation risk | Low Risk
Pays better Higher growth
37.6 pts lower View career
Why it fits

Builds on visual composition, image editing, print preparation, and client-ready output with portfolio work.

Camera and Photographic Equipment Repairers
60% automation risk | Moderate Risk
Pays better
11.7 pts lower View career
Why it fits

Uses photographic equipment knowledge, optics handling, and precision troubleshooting with repair training.


Share your results with friends and family.

Occupation snapshot

What does this snowflake show?
The Snowflake is a visual summary of the five badges: Automation Risk (calculated), Risk (polled), Growth, Wages and Volume. It gives you an instant snapshot of an occupations profile. The colour of the Snowflake relates to its size. The better the occupation scores in relation to others, the larger and greener the Snowflake becomes.
JOB SCORE
1.6/10
What's this?
Job Score (higher is better):

We rate jobs using four factors. These are:

- Chance of being automated
- Job growth
- Wages
- Volume of available positions

These are some key things to think about when job hunting.

Risk & user votes

Calculated automation risk

71% (High Risk)

High Risk (61-80%): This occupation shows a significant risk of end-to-end replacement by automation. Many core parts of the role may be structured, repeatable, software-driven, or physically predictable enough for AI, machines, or robotic systems to take over. If you work in this area, it may be worth exploring safer related careers or moving towards more human-centred responsibilities.

More information on what this score is, and how it is calculated is available here.

Human strengths important in this job

These are human abilities and work contexts that are important in this occupation. They may help explain why parts of the role are harder to replace end-to-end, but they are not the only inputs into the automation score.

Thinking creatively

Quite important
Why this matters
Coming up with original ideas and designs—creating new concepts, products, systems, or artistic work. This kind of open-ended invention and taste-based judgment is harder to automate end-to-end than routine, rule-based tasks.
Jobs that also use this strength

Working directly with the public

Quite important
Why this matters
The job involves face-to-face interaction with customers, clients, or guests—answering questions, handling requests, and managing service situations in real time. Roles with frequent public interaction are harder to replace end-to-end because they rely on trust, communication, and adapting to unpredictable human needs.
Jobs that also use this strength

Decision-making and problem solving

Quite important
Why this matters
Analyze information, weigh tradeoffs, and choose the best solution—especially when situations are ambiguous, high-stakes, or have real-world consequences.
Jobs that also use this strength

What users think

Based on 29 votes

75% chance of full automation within the next two decades

Our visitors have voted that it's probable this occupation will be automated. This assessment is further supported by the calculated automation risk level, which estimates 71% chance of automation.

What do you think the risk of automation is?

What is the likelihood that Photographic Process Workers and Processing Machine Operators will be replaced by robots or artificial intelligence within the next 20 years?

View sentiment trend

Pay & outlook

Wages

Very low paid relative to other professions

In 2024, the median annual wage for Photographic Process Workers and Processing Machine Operators was $40,100 ($19 per hour).

The median annual wage for Photographic Process Workers and Processing Machine Operators was 19.0% lower than the national median annual wage, which stood at $49,500.

View wage trend

Wages over time

* Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics

Growth

Very slow growth relative to other professions.

The number of 'Photographic Process Workers and Processing Machine Operators' job openings is expected to decline 2.6% by 2034

View employment trend

Total employment, and estimated job openings

* Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period between 2023 and 2033
Updated projections are due 09-2025.

Volume

Significantly lower range of job opportunities compared to other professions

As of 2024 there were 5,550 people employed as 'Photographic Process Workers and Processing Machine Operators' within the United States.

This represents around < 0.001% of the employed workforce across the country

Put another way, around 1 in 27 thousand people are employed as 'Photographic Process Workers and Processing Machine Operators'.

People also viewed

Accountants and Auditors Electricians Actors Lawyers Computer Programmers

What people are saying (0)


Leave a reply about this occupation
0/8000

Job description

Perform work involved in developing and processing photographic images from film or digital media. May perform precision tasks such as editing photographic negatives and prints.

O*NET-SOC code: 51-9151.00