Explore safer careers (5)
Lower estimated automation risk
Why it fits
Applies reporting, process metrics, stakeholder questions, and recommendations to operational improvement.
Why it fits
Applies data modeling, repository structure, performance, governance, and integration knowledge.
Why it fits
Directly reuses SQL, ETL, data quality, repository design, reporting, and stakeholder data needs.
Why it fits
Uses data patterns, sampling, metrics, and quantitative reporting with stronger statistical methodology.
Why it fits
Transfers analytical modeling, optimization, reporting, and decision-support skills to operational problems.
Occupation snapshot
What does this snowflake show?
What's this?
We rate jobs using four factors. These are:
- Chance of being automated
- Job growth
- Wages
- Volume of available positions
These are some key things to think about when job hunting.
Risk & user votes
Calculated automation risk
Low Risk (21-40%): This occupation has a lower risk of full replacement by AI, software, or robotic systems. Some tasks may be automated or assisted, but the role usually still relies on human judgement, communication, responsibility, physical adaptability, or practical decision-making.
More information on what this score is, and how it is calculated is available here.
Human strengths important in this job
These are human abilities and work contexts that are important in this occupation. They may help explain why parts of the role are harder to replace end-to-end, but they are not the only inputs into the automation score.
Thinking creatively
Quite importantWhy this matters
Critical thinking
Quite importantWhy this matters
Instructing
Quite importantWhy this matters
Communicating with people outside the organization
Quite importantWhy this matters
Consulting and advising others
Quite importantWhy this matters
Show 1 more strength
Active learning
Quite importantWhy this matters
What users think
Based on 453 votes
Our visitors have voted that it's very probable this occupation will be automated. However, employees may be able to find reassurance in the automated risk level we have generated, which shows 33% chance of automation.
What do you think the risk of automation is?
What is the likelihood that Business Intelligence Analysts will be replaced by robots or artificial intelligence within the next 20 years?
Sentiment
Based on user votes over time
View sentiment trend
How opinions have changed over time
Pay & outlook
Wages
In 2024, the median annual wage for Data Scientists was $112,590 ($54 per hour).
The median annual wage for Data Scientists was 127.5% higher than the national median annual wage, which stood at $49,500.
Growth
The number of 'Data Scientists' job openings is expected to rise 33.5% by 2034
Updated projections are due 09-2025.
Volume
As of 2024 there were 233,440 people employed as 'Data Scientists' within the United States.
This represents around 0.15% of the employed workforce across the country
Put another way, around 1 in 660 people are employed as 'Data Scientists'.
People also viewed
Job description
Produce financial and market intelligence by querying data repositories and generating periodic reports. Devise methods for identifying data patterns and trends in available information sources.
O*NET-SOC code: 15-2051.01
What people are saying (13)
The bulk of my time as a BI analyst is spent on 2 things. The first is working with domain stakeholders without technical knowledge (marketers in my case). This can often be like herding cats. Lots of people will have lots of different opinions on what KPIs they want to track or how to track them. And often they don't really understand the data limitations of what we can and can't report on, so I need to be there to provide guidance. Much of my job is spent guiding these people along, often massaging their egos along the way, so that the wider group of people arrives at a consensus.
The second is ETL. Even with whole teams of data engineers and operations managers, data is very rarely centralised into a single and easy to understand model. I work with about half a dozen different types of data sources (from AWS to Google Sheets). Each of these have hundreds of different indexes and many of those indexes have hundreds of fields. A tiny fraction of these fields have any kind of documentation and so all you have to go on is the metadata and the name of the db managers who put it together. Actually tracking down the data you need requires getting really into the weeds and following up with multiple people to try to track down who actually knows where to find the data you're looking for. That's just nowhere near enough data for an AI to get a hold of the data it needs.
It is a field where people usually believe in other people rather than AI.
The ETL process is also a complicated, one which most AI is not nor ever may be able to handle, data needs to be cleaned and standardized before AI can take a crack at it, the "AI" and yes I have to put that in quotes does not understand the context of anything, it is a prediction model using gradient boosters that performs quite well under controlled circumstances, thrown into any critical thought role it starts to lose pace. Furthermore nobody who works in the AI space authoring models ands understands the inner workings of "AI" treats this as anything more than a highly sophisticated toy...maybe in another 10 years we can come back to this question and see if we should start to worry.
I spend half of my time maintaining, tweaking, and fixing automation jobs - these include dashboards, data sets, and database tables.
It requires a technical person who is also an expert in their business domain to translate business requirements into data or reports that others need.
Reply to comment