Commercial Pilots

Oli (Low) 5 days ago

People will not trust to get on a plane from the current generations unless there is a qualified pilot onboard. Many people already have fear of flying and this would just make it worse for them since there is no real human being in the cockpit and it is controlled remotely. Additionally, it is just generally safer for a real human pilot as they are able to use their experience and training across emergency situations. For example, AI is very procedural and programmed to do exactly what manuals and procedures say, but what if there is a catastrophic emergency that requires quick-thinking? Many emergencies are procedural however there are exceptions when a pilots own experience is necessary for the safety of others. Plus, a real pilot is going to have empathy and adrenaline in a emergency situation as they also want to save themselves.. A remote controlled plane or AI powered plane won't have this and it will be a completely different situation. Maybe 20-30 years there could be single-pilot operations but no full automation.

0 0 Reply

T (No chance) 13 days ago

No human being will get on an airplane without a human being AT LEAST as a backup. APUs are constantly INOP in commercial aviation. APUs are not bullet proof and even if they were a human will always be in an airplane flying other human beings.

0 0 Reply

Jim 5 months ago

There is a huge shortage of pilots. This and AI could help the case for a reduction to a single pilot per flight (easy profit booster). Not looking like a great career option for the amount of stress, pressure, and training required.

0 2 Reply

Overall equivalent (No chance) 5 months ago

FAA
Passenger airlines no chance in 20 years
Cargo would be the first
Pilot unions are very strong
Single pilot flights are possible with a copilot remote as needed.

1 2 Reply

CFIguy (No chance) 6 months ago

We already have the technology to automate aviation, but I see no chance of it happening in the next few decades. The FAA moves slowly, airlines are controlled by pilot unions, and the AI would much much more real world training to understand emergency situations before it would be trusted with autonomously flying an aircraft. Maybe by 2060 we might see some planes go automated, but until then it is still a very rewarding and fun career to pursue.

1 1 Reply

Luca (Low) 8 months ago

requires human interference in accidents and emergencies
have to be 1000% reliable in order to not cause problems
can scare public away

3 2 Reply

Felipe (Low) 9 months ago

Simple. The pilot is the hierarchy within the system. Today, AI can indeed perform even complex tasks, but you can never trust an AI 100% to pilot an airplane. The critical factor is simple: if there is any change or problem with the aircraft, a pilot can act quickly by not strictly following airline protocols. Following protocols 100% does not always guarantee safety.

Examples like TACA Flight 110, where a Boeing 737-300 lost both engines, show this. Instead of following the manual and returning, the pilots landed on the grass ahead, which was the right decision. This applies to many situations. In the case of United Airlines Flight 232, it's another example. Following the correct protocols isn't always the right choice and can sometimes prevent worse tragedies.

In the United case, let's suppose an AI is in command and the plane loses all three hydraulic systems. The company's manual doesn't cover a situation where all engines are lost. At that moment, what would the AI do? Even if it follows the tower controller's voice commands correctly, it’s impossible to determine the flight's fate because there's no human inside. However, this isn't to say that following protocols is always wrong. It’s just a reminder to follow protocols, but if you ever need to break them, it should be in a life-or-death situation.

2 2 Reply

Furry Racoon Cat (Moderate) 9 months ago

With autopilot becoming more prevalent and the rise of autonomous navigation systems, there is a chance that pilots could be replaced.

0 7 Reply

Joe (No chance) 9 months ago

Pilots cannot be replaced by AI since there are many skills that AI can't possess like complex decision making and most passengers wouldn't trust AI to operate their aircraft. 20 years from now, many of the newer planes that fly nowadays will still be flying in 2040. Another consideration is the single pilot operation, which is the primary focus right now which will not likely happen before the 2040s. Pilots have minimal risk of being automated.

2 3 Reply

Stirling Martin (Low) 10 months ago

Cybersecurity could make this impossible.

2 3 Reply

Ron Hounslow (No chance) 10 months ago

All large commercial aircraft currently in production and coming off the production line today need two pilots for operation during crucial stages of flight. It will take a decade plus plus for the regulatory requirement to change,

Many of those airframes are going to be in service for the next fifteen to twenty years plus.

What you may see in the next decade or so is a reduction in the number of pilots required by the industry overall if single pilot in the cruise becomes allowable on Long Haul Flights.

3 3 Reply

do not want to say (Low) 10 months ago

because eve with ai there will be thousand of plane in the sky at one time and one miscalculation from the ai on a plane can cause it to crash

0 4 Reply

EK1934 (Uncertain) 11 months ago

The thing is, it will take a long time to develop and for AI to get approved by the FAA

1 3 Reply

Miles (Low) 11 months ago

commercial pilots have some instances of ai but commercial pilots take years of training naps and skills to complete
And ai would need to learn a lot of controls and would need precise management one small move and the ai is done.

0 3 Reply

Mani salah (Low) 12 months ago

The artificial intllegence can't replace the human's emotion and it's way of thinking in some situations and must be supervised by a trained and experienced pilot

5 3 Reply

Aranyak Maitra (Moderate) 1 year ago

The development of automated and remote flying technology for military equipment can be a game changer for civil aviation industry. Automation has already reduced the number of pilots from 3 to 2.

1 7 Reply

Luke (No chance) 1 year ago

Pilots can do things robots can't. Somtimes you can't follow the rules and need to break them. Think about the gimli glider. The pilot had no landing gear, he was way too high and way too fast. He did a side slip menuveur, only able to be completed in glider aircraft. It was a risky move but it would have to be done if they wanted to land. They succeded by breaking the rules and testing the limits. That is somthing that can nevery be done by a robot.

9 2 Reply

someone (Low) 1 year ago

because there is still going to be someone watching over the ai to make sure it doesn't make mistakes and also someone needs to take over in an emergency

1 2 Reply

Lisa (Uncertain) 1 year ago

This one is tricky! I do not doubt AI could learn to proficiently drive a plane, though I do doubt if they're reliable in terms of safety. I foresee companies using this to cut costs, only to receive public outcry in return. I think the real question here is: Do we want artificial intelligence driving our planes?

2 2 Reply

Matheus (Low) 1 year ago

The competent regulatory body, (FAA) is VERY conservative. So even if we had the technology, I doubt that they would allow autonomous commercial planes.
In this case, regulation is the hold-up, not the technology.

2 2 Reply