Compare Occupations

SUMMARY
25%
Low Risk
12%
Minimal Risk
24%
Low Risk
22%
Low Risk
28%
Low Risk
JOB SCORE 5.0/10 5.7/10 6.8/10 5.4/10 4.1/10
POLLING
41%
(Moderate Risk, Based on 24 votes)
There hasn't been enough votes on this occupation yet
There hasn't been enough votes on this occupation yet
37%
(Low Risk, Based on 326 votes)
There hasn't been enough votes on this occupation yet
GROWTH
by year 2034
2.5%
3.4%
5.3%
-1.3%
-3.2%
WAGES
$59,330
or $28.52 per hour
$67,950
or $32.67 per hour
$78,690
or $37.83 per hour
$87,980
or $42.29 per hour
$54,310
or $26.11 per hour
VOLUME
as of 2024
29,530
25,590
806,080
5,910
31,080
SNOWFLAKE [?] The Snowflake is a visual summary of the five badges: Automation Risk (calculated), Risk (polled), Growth, Wages and Volume. It gives you an instant snapshot of an occupations profile. The colour of the Snowflake relates to its size. The better the occupation scores in relation to others, the larger and greener the Snowflake becomes. Snowflake diagram for First-Line Supervisors of Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Workers Snowflake diagram for Range Managers Snowflake diagram for First-Line Supervisors of Construction Trades and Extraction Workers Snowflake diagram for Farmers, Ranchers, and Other Agricultural Managers Snowflake diagram for Forest and Conservation Technicians
DESCRIPTION Directly supervise and coordinate the activities of agricultural, forestry, aquacultural, and related workers. Research or study range land management practices to provide sustained production of forage, livestock, and wildlife. Directly supervise and coordinate activities of construction or extraction workers. Plan, direct, or coordinate the management or operation of farms, ranches, greenhouses, aquacultural operations, nurseries, timber tracts, or other agricultural establishments. May hire, train, and supervise farm workers or contract for services to carry out the day-to-day activities of the managed operation. May engage in or supervise planting, cultivating, harvesting, and financial and marketing activities. Provide technical assistance regarding the conservation of soil, water, forests, or related natural resources. May compile data pertaining to size, content, condition, and other characteristics of forest tracts under the direction of foresters, or train and lead forest workers in forest propagation and fire prevention and suppression. May assist conservation scientists in managing, improving, and protecting rangelands and wildlife habitats.

Compare Occupations Side by Side

Curious how automation and AI could affect your career? Our comparison tool lets you view two or more jobs side by side, helping you quickly spot differences in risk level, pay, growth, and popularity. All of this is based on a mix of academic research, user polling, and official labour data.

Automation Risk

Each occupation shows a probability of automation. A higher score means machines and algorithms are more likely to take over the role in the future.

Job Score

A quick summary of how a job performs overall — factoring in wages, growth, volume, and automation risk. It’s a handy way to see the bigger picture at a glance.

Polling Data

Thousands of visitors cast their votes on how “automatable” each job feels. These community insights are shown alongside the calculated probabilities.

Growth & Wages

See how fast each occupation is projected to grow and what people earn on average. High wages don’t always mean high security — automation risk still matters.

Volume of Workers

Explore how many people currently work in each occupation and in which year the data was recorded. Popularity can affect how disruptive automation will be for the wider economy.

The Snowflake Diagram

Each snowflake visualises the balance between automation risk, wages, growth, and job volume. Bigger and greener areas mean stronger performance in that dimension.

Use this comparison page to research careers, guide students, or simply explore the future of work. All data is regularly updated to keep the results relevant.