Automation Risk
Each occupation shows a probability of automation. A higher score means machines and algorithms are more likely to take over the role in the future.
| SUMMARY |
33%
Low Risk
|
10%
Minimal Risk
|
10%
Minimal Risk
|
21%
Low Risk
|
24%
Low Risk
|
25%
Low Risk
|
| JOB SCORE | 3.7/10 | 8.0/10 | 6.5/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.2/10 | 5.4/10 |
| POLLING |
There hasn't been enough votes on this occupation yet
|
28%
(Low Risk,
Based on 52 votes)
|
45%
(Moderate Risk,
Based on 21 votes)
|
There hasn't been enough votes on this occupation yet
|
37%
(Low Risk,
Based on 44 votes)
|
There hasn't been enough votes on this occupation yet
|
|
GROWTH
by year 2034
|
2.5%
|
3.8%
|
3.0%
|
4.5%
|
4.5%
|
2.7%
|
| WAGES |
$41,600
or $20.00 per hour
|
$104,690
or $50.33 per hour
|
$81,270
or $39.07 per hour
|
$136,550
or $65.64 per hour
|
$136,550
or $65.64 per hour
|
$58,610
or $28.18 per hour
|
|
VOLUME
as of 2024
|
83,110
|
141,090
|
1,128,200
|
630,980
|
630,980
|
70,310
|
| SNOWFLAKE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DESCRIPTION | Implement procedures and systems to prevent merchandise loss. Conduct audits and investigations of employee activity. May assist in developing policies, procedures, and systems for safeguarding assets. | Direct an organization's security functions, including physical security and safety of employees and facilities. | Conduct security assessments for organizations, and design security systems and processes. May specialize in areas such as physical security or the safety of employees and facilities. | Plan and direct policies, procedures, or systems to prevent the loss of assets. Determine risk exposure or potential liability, and develop risk control measures. | Plan, direct, or coordinate activities of an organization to ensure compliance with ethical or regulatory standards. | Directly supervise and coordinate activities of security workers and security guards. |
Curious how automation and AI could affect your career? Our comparison tool lets you view two or more jobs side by side, helping you quickly spot differences in risk level, pay, growth, and popularity. All of this is based on a mix of academic research, user polling, and official labour data.
Each occupation shows a probability of automation. A higher score means machines and algorithms are more likely to take over the role in the future.
A quick summary of how a job performs overall — factoring in wages, growth, volume, and automation risk. It’s a handy way to see the bigger picture at a glance.
Thousands of visitors cast their votes on how “automatable” each job feels. These community insights are shown alongside the calculated probabilities.
See how fast each occupation is projected to grow and what people earn on average. High wages don’t always mean high security — automation risk still matters.
Explore how many people currently work in each occupation and in which year the data was recorded. Popularity can affect how disruptive automation will be for the wider economy.
Each snowflake visualises the balance between automation risk, wages, growth, and job volume. Bigger and greener areas mean stronger performance in that dimension.
Use this comparison page to research careers, guide students, or simply explore the future of work. All data is regularly updated to keep the results relevant.