Alternative careers
Related career paths that build on similar skills and experience
Why it fits
Transfers visual direction, creative concepts, sets, brand tone, production constraints, and leadership of creative teams.
Why it fits
Uses talent relationships, contracts context, scheduling, promotion, negotiations, and entertainment industry knowledge.
Why it fits
Directly reuses production planning, audience judgment, scheduling, content standards, staff coordination, and broadcast priorities.
Why it fits
Uses casting judgment, performer direction, auditions, creative briefs, scheduling, negotiation context, and production needs.
Occupation snapshot
What does this snowflake show?
What's this?
We rate jobs using four factors. These are:
- Chance of being automated
- Job growth
- Wages
- Volume of available positions
These are some key things to think about when job hunting.
Risk & user votes
Calculated automation risk
Minimal Risk (0-20%): This occupation appears difficult to replace end-to-end with current or near-future automation, including AI software and robotics. Roles in this range usually depend on human judgement, creativity, care, leadership, specialist expertise, or adapting to messy real-world situations. AI and machines may still change parts of the work, but the occupation is likely to remain a distinct human role.
More information on what this score is, and how it is calculated is available here.
Human strengths important in this job
These are human abilities and work contexts that are important in this occupation. They may help explain why parts of the role are harder to replace end-to-end, but they are not the only inputs into the automation score.
Thinking creatively
Very importantWhy this matters
Decision-making and problem solving
Very importantWhy this matters
Social perceptiveness
Quite importantWhy this matters
Negotiation
Quite importantWhy this matters
Coordinating others’ work
Quite importantWhy this matters
Show 3 more strengths
Communicating with people outside the organization
Quite importantWhy this matters
Developing objectives and strategies
Quite importantWhy this matters
Active learning
Quite importantWhy this matters
What users think
Based on 497 votes
Our visitors have voted there's a low chance this occupation will be automated. This assessment is further supported by the calculated automation risk level, which estimates 15% chance of automation.
What do you think the risk of automation is?
What is the likelihood that Producers and Directors will be replaced by robots or artificial intelligence within the next 20 years?
Sentiment
Based on user votes over time
View sentiment trend
How opinions have changed over time
Pay & outlook
Wages
In 2024, the median annual wage for Producers and Directors was $83,480 ($40 per hour).
The median annual wage for Producers and Directors was 68.6% higher than the national median annual wage, which stood at $49,500.
View wage trend
Wages over time
Growth
The number of 'Producers and Directors' job openings is expected to rise 4.9% by 2034
View employment trend
Total employment, and estimated job openings
Updated projections are due 09-2025.
Volume
As of 2024 there were 145,270 people employed as 'Producers and Directors' within the United States.
This represents around 0.09% of the employed workforce across the country
Put another way, around 1 in 1 thousand people are employed as 'Producers and Directors'.
People also viewed
Job description
Produce or direct stage, television, radio, video, or film productions for entertainment, information, or instruction. Responsible for creative decisions, such as interpretation of script, choice of actors or guests, set design, sound, special effects, and choreography.
O*NET-SOC code: 27-2012.00
What people are saying (18)
Directors main role is to watch video and talk to actors. For machine learning, you would need a huge database of director comments in order to generate the necessary remarks. I’m not sure how this would be done.
Producer‘s job is to organise shoots and arrange funding. This is much easier to automate.
I would produce a risk at 40%, director risk, 20%.
Reply to comment