Waiters and Waitresses

High Risk
Low High

Explore safer careers (5)

Lower estimated automation risk

First-Line Supervisors of Food Preparation and Serving Workers
20% automation risk | Minimal Risk
Pays better Higher growth
43.1 pts lower View career
Why it fits

Directly reuses table service, shift flow, guest issues, food safety, service standards, and staff coaching.

Meeting, Convention, and Event Planners
23% automation risk | Low Risk
Pays better Higher growth
39.3 pts lower View career
Why it fits

Fits servers with banquet experience using event timing, guest needs, vendors, menus, and on-site coordination.

Food Service Managers
35% automation risk | Low Risk
Pays better Higher growth
27.9 pts lower View career
Why it fits

Fits experienced servers using staffing, guest experience, inventory, food safety, schedules, and sales.

Bartenders
41% automation risk | Moderate Risk
Higher growth
21.2 pts lower View career
Why it fits

Applies guest service, orders, payments, menu knowledge, timing, upselling, and calm work under pressure.

Concierges
40% automation risk | Moderate Risk
Pays better Higher growth
22.3 pts lower View career
Why it fits

Transfers hospitality, local recommendations, guest requests, problem solving, reservations, and polished service.


Share your results with friends and family.

Occupation snapshot

What does this snowflake show?
The Snowflake is a visual summary of the five badges: Automation Risk (calculated), Risk (polled), Growth, Wages and Volume. It gives you an instant snapshot of an occupations profile. The colour of the Snowflake relates to its size. The better the occupation scores in relation to others, the larger and greener the Snowflake becomes.
JOB SCORE
2.5/10
What's this?
Job Score (higher is better):

We rate jobs using four factors. These are:

- Chance of being automated
- Job growth
- Wages
- Volume of available positions

These are some key things to think about when job hunting.

Risk & user votes

Calculated automation risk

63% (High Risk)

High Risk (61-80%): This occupation shows a significant risk of end-to-end replacement by automation. Many core parts of the role may be structured, repeatable, software-driven, or physically predictable enough for AI, machines, or robotic systems to take over. If you work in this area, it may be worth exploring safer related careers or moving towards more human-centred responsibilities.

More information on what this score is, and how it is calculated is available here.

Human strengths important in this job

These are human abilities and work contexts that are important in this occupation. They may help explain why parts of the role are harder to replace end-to-end, but they are not the only inputs into the automation score.

Working directly with the public

Very important
Why this matters
The job involves face-to-face interaction with customers, clients, or guests—answering questions, handling requests, and managing service situations in real time. Roles with frequent public interaction are harder to replace end-to-end because they rely on trust, communication, and adapting to unpredictable human needs.
Jobs that also use this strength

Assisting and caring for others

Quite important
Why this matters
Provide hands-on help, emotional support, or personal care to people—work that depends on empathy, trust, and responding to individual needs in the moment.
Jobs that also use this strength

Coordinating others’ work

Quite important
Why this matters
Bringing people together, assigning tasks, and keeping a group aligned so work gets done.
Jobs that also use this strength

What users think

Based on 609 votes

68% chance of full automation within the next two decades

Our visitors have voted that it's probable this occupation will be automated. This assessment is further supported by the calculated automation risk level, which estimates 63% chance of automation.

What do you think the risk of automation is?

What is the likelihood that Waiters and Waitresses will be replaced by robots or artificial intelligence within the next 20 years?

Sentiment

Based on user votes over time

View sentiment trend

How opinions have changed over time

Pay & outlook

Wages

Very low paid relative to other professions

In 2024, the median annual wage for Waiters and Waitresses was $33,760 ($16 per hour).

The median annual wage for Waiters and Waitresses was 31.8% lower than the national median annual wage, which stood at $49,500.

View wage trend

Wages over time

* Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics

Growth

Slow growth relative to other professions.

The number of 'Waiters and Waitresses' job openings is expected to decline 0.7% by 2034

View employment trend

Total employment, and estimated job openings

* Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period between 2023 and 2033
Updated projections are due 09-2025.

Volume

Significantly greater range of job opportunities compared to other professions

As of 2024 there were 2,302,690 people employed as 'Waiters and Waitresses' within the United States.

This represents around 1.5% of the employed workforce across the country

Put another way, around 1 in 66 people are employed as 'Waiters and Waitresses'.

People also viewed

Lawyers Computer Programmers Actors Accountants and Auditors Taxi Drivers

What people are saying (28)

Leave a comment
Gracie
04 Nov 2025 14:59
As someone currently working as a waitress, it’s both interesting and a little scary to think about how fast things are changing. Robots could handle simple tasks like carrying food or taking orders, but real servers do so much more than that. We make people feel welcome, remembering regulars, and create personal experiences. Technology can help with the repetitive parts, but it can’t replace human connection. I think the future might have space for both robots and humans, working together to make dining more efficient while still keeping that personal touch that only humans can provide (personality and communication skills) .
Dan
21 Jul 2025 16:01
I’ve been a server for 20 years. I feel my job has never been more threatened than it is right now due to AI. Customers do want an interactive social experience, yes, but I feel the businesses will try their absolute hardest to replace servers with AI and hope it doesn’t fail. Businesses have been fighting hard to make up the profits lost from covid, supply chain issues, inflation etc, so getting rid of the labor will be a high priority for them. Humans call out sick, demand benefits, complain to HR, get tired, make mistakes etc. AI won’t do any of those things. Having AI will help get rid of half the management staff too cause there will be less employees to babysit. Look at McDonalds. When you place your order you use the touchscreen computer now. Years ago you’d go to the counter and talk to a human. It will happen everywhere, grocery stores too.
Dan (Low)
22 May 2025 20:55
People want a human experience. Maybe the kitchen staff will be replaced.
reilly (Highly likely)
02 Jul 2024 00:47
Japan.
ya (Highly likely)
24 Mar 2024 20:39
Now I start to see more robot waiters which can mean that soon, waiter jobs will be taken.
youausduasdasa (Highly likely)
17 Oct 2023 02:49
because they just walk around and take order. Japan is already doing it so we should too
Alisha
31 Aug 2023 23:17
AI is REALLY taking over the world!!!
SCARED for the next generation!!
Ernest Onunze (Low)
01 Aug 2023 03:01
It is because it involves emotion and social understanding. Can AI interprets moods, feelings and stress this what waiters and waitress does better
Gwen (Low)
09 Jun 2023 20:22
Food service workers in fast food, buffets, etc., do face a risk of replacement and you can already see it happening. Actual servers who provide full table service do not face the same risk, in my opinion.

Ultimately, going out to eat is an experience. Going through a drive-thru serves a functional purpose, you need food and you need it within minutes. Full service restaurants exist to give people somewhere to *go*. Somewhere to socialize, celebrate, grab a drink, mourn a bad day, take a load off, sit down with a good book, write a good book, get some office work done, etc., etc. It’s about experiencing human connections, even if you’re eating alone, you still have the company of your server, of the other patrons surrounding you. We crave human connection, we’re social creatures by nature, otherwise, everyone would just stay home. To-go and delivery has existed for forever and full service restaurants still stand, because the *people* are the draw.

Customers want to become regulars, they delight in their name or order being remembered, couples want a place they think of as “theirs” that they return to every year for their anniversary, they want to tell the server it’s their birthday so they can get that free piece of cake, so their waiter will wish them well or sing for them. They want someone to joke around with, to tease and be teased, to flirt, to leave their number on a receipt even though they know they won’t call. They want their baby to be cooed at and made to laugh. They want the bartender to listen to them wax poetic about their bad breakup. Speaking of bartenders, I don’t think people realize how much they keep you safe. They’ll keep an eye on your drink, put your purse behind the bar, toss out the drunken idiot harassing everyone.

And on a less positive note—people *especially* want someone to level their fury at. When their order is messed up or the food isn’t to their liking or when they have to wait too long to be seated. You can’t be mad at a robot. I mean, you can be, but I’m certain it won’t give the same satisfaction that whatever it is miserable people get out of bullying waitstaff. What I’m saying is—people crave human interaction…and that includes asking for the manager.

Maybe it would be a different story if AI could mimic human behavior, but even then, it can’t get around the uncanny valley effect. People need people.
Stu
07 Apr 2023 09:42
As a customer it won’t be nearly as fun to watch a robot run after the condiments. Haha
Cd Guthrie (No chance)
06 Mar 2023 11:45
Can’t anticipate guests needs and time constraints simultaneously while providing the warmth of caring
Stefan Deleanu (Low)
30 Jul 2022 01:02
It is highly unlikely due to the social aspect of being a waiter. We can see this based on the effect home delivery services had on the HORECA industry. People still want social contact and not some robotic interaction.

I assume culture will change in future generations. This is similar to how there are love hotels and vending machines for everything in Japan, which wouldn't be acceptable in the Western world.
Bro
28 Dec 2021 00:38
All the fast food restaurants now do this and most restaurants use seamless/Grubhub for delivery. Delivery to my table in the restaurant via my phone is next.
Mitch (Highly likely)
08 Oct 2021 07:09
Low skill. Unnecessary. Humans performing the task are unpredictable and often unreliable.
Karl (No chance)
23 Aug 2021 18:20
Where do servers make 11$ an hour? That's crazy low.
Chloe (No chance)
24 May 2021 04:16
I do think robots could replace waiters at certain restaurants but not entirely. As a waitress I feel a lot of the customers are looking for a waitress not a robot or a screen to press, they’re coming to be served and for the personal interaction. Just look at places like hooters or the restaurants where the staff is paid to make crude jokes and insults to you. A robot can’t do that.
Bruna
20 May 2021 21:54
Will robots also hear your romantic dramas or give you advice? Waiters' job is also about interaction
Jeffro (Low)
13 Apr 2021 19:55
Upscale restaurant servers will always be human.
Julia
25 Oct 2020 14:29
I really hope not, some waiters and waitresses are really nice
austin (Uncertain)
11 Jun 2020 02:18
i certainly see fast food waiters being eliminated however "fancy" dine-in i think is less likely

Leave a reply about this occupation
0/8000

Job description

Take orders and serve food and beverages to patrons at tables in dining establishment.

O*NET-SOC code: 35-3031.00