Aerospace Engineers


People also viewed
Calculated automation risk
Low Risk (21-40%): Jobs in this level have a limited risk of automation, as they demand a mix of technical and human-centric skills.
More information on what this score is, and how it is calculated is available here.
User poll
Our visitors have voted there's a low chance this occupation will be automated. This assessment is further supported by the calculated automation risk level, which estimates 39% chance of automation.
What do you think the risk of automation is?
What is the likelihood that Aerospace Engineers will be replaced by robots or artificial intelligence within the next 20 years?
Sentiment
The following graph is included wherever there is a substantial amount of votes to render meaningful data. These visual representations display user poll results over time, providing a significant indication of sentiment trends.
Sentiment over time (yearly)
Growth
The number of 'Aerospace Engineers' job openings is expected to rise 6.0% by 2033
Total employment, and estimated job openings
Updated projections are due 09-2025.
Wages
In 2023, the median annual wage for 'Aerospace Engineers' was $130,720, or $62 per hour
'Aerospace Engineers' were paid 172.0% higher than the national median wage, which stood at $48,060
Wages over time
Volume
As of 2023 there were 66,660 people employed as 'Aerospace Engineers' within the United States.
This represents around < 0.001% of the employed workforce across the country
Put another way, around 1 in 2 thousand people are employed as 'Aerospace Engineers'.
Job description
Perform engineering duties in designing, constructing, and testing aircraft, missiles, and spacecraft. May conduct basic and applied research to evaluate adaptability of materials and equipment to aircraft design and manufacture. May recommend improvements in testing equipment and techniques.
SOC Code: 17-2011.00

Comments
Leave a comment
World now is not waiting for us to improve it WILL improve.
Take a look at the 2013 Proton rocket crash. It occurred because the engineer installed the rotation sensors upside down, causing it to plummet to the ground. Such a small mistake resulted in $65 million dollars in losses.
However, it could be possible that AI will create more efficient propulsion designs in the future.
Leave a reply about this occupation