Alternative careers
Related career paths that build on similar skills and experience
Why it fits
Uses research planning, lab operations, grants, safety, staff coordination, budgets, and scientific review.
Why it fits
Fits faculty with industry or lab leadership using engineering judgment, project oversight, budgets, staff, and technical review.
Why it fits
Applies instructional design, technical workshops, learner assessment, materials, demonstrations, and feedback.
Why it fits
Fits electrical faculty using circuits, power, controls, instrumentation, testing, standards, and design review.
Occupation snapshot
What does this snowflake show?
What's this?
We rate jobs using four factors. These are:
- Chance of being automated
- Job growth
- Wages
- Volume of available positions
These are some key things to think about when job hunting.
Risk & user votes
Calculated automation risk
Minimal Risk (0-20%): This occupation appears difficult to replace end-to-end with current or near-future automation, including AI software and robotics. Roles in this range usually depend on human judgement, creativity, care, leadership, specialist expertise, or adapting to messy real-world situations. AI and machines may still change parts of the work, but the occupation is likely to remain a distinct human role.
More information on what this score is, and how it is calculated is available here.
Human strengths important in this job
These are human abilities and work contexts that are important in this occupation. They may help explain why parts of the role are harder to replace end-to-end, but they are not the only inputs into the automation score.
Thinking creatively
Very importantWhy this matters
Decision-making and problem solving
Very importantWhy this matters
Instructing
Very importantWhy this matters
Social perceptiveness
Quite importantWhy this matters
Coordinating others’ work
Quite importantWhy this matters
Show 3 more strengths
Developing objectives and strategies
Quite importantWhy this matters
Communicating with people outside the organization
Quite importantWhy this matters
Active learning
Quite importantWhy this matters
What users think
Based on 52 votes
Our visitors have voted they are unsure if this occupation will be automated. However, employees may be able to find reassurance in the automated risk level we have generated, which shows 10% chance of automation.
What do you think the risk of automation is?
What is the likelihood that Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary will be replaced by robots or artificial intelligence within the next 20 years?
View sentiment trend
Pay & outlook
Wages
In 2024, the median annual wage for Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary was $106,120 ($51 per hour).
The median annual wage for Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary was 114.4% higher than the national median annual wage, which stood at $49,500.
View wage trend
Wages over time
Growth
The number of 'Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary' job openings is expected to rise 8.1% by 2034
View employment trend
Total employment, and estimated job openings
Updated projections are due 09-2025.
Volume
As of 2024 there were 39,910 people employed as 'Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary' within the United States.
This represents around < 0.001% of the employed workforce across the country
Put another way, around 1 in 3 thousand people are employed as 'Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary'.
People also viewed
Job description
Teach courses pertaining to the application of physical laws and principles of engineering for the development of machines, materials, instruments, processes, and services. Includes teachers of subjects such as chemical, civil, electrical, industrial, mechanical, mineral, and petroleum engineering. Includes both teachers primarily engaged in teaching and those who do a combination of teaching and research.
O*NET-SOC code: 25-1032.00
What people are saying (2)
Reply to comment