Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health
Explore safer careers (1)
Lower estimated automation risk
Why it fits
Uses environmental hazards, sampling data, treatment systems, permits, controls, risk interpretation, and technical reports.
Alternative careers
Related career paths that build on similar skills and experience
Why it fits
Transfers hazard recognition, exposure controls, inspections, training, incident records, and compliance documentation.
Why it fits
Fits scientists with water focus using hydrology data, permits, watershed impacts, maps, and stakeholder coordination.
Why it fits
Applies water sampling, flow data, contamination pathways, models, field reports, and environmental risk analysis.
Occupation snapshot
What does this snowflake show?
What's this?
We rate jobs using four factors. These are:
- Chance of being automated
- Job growth
- Wages
- Volume of available positions
These are some key things to think about when job hunting.
Risk & user votes
Calculated automation risk
Low Risk (21-40%): This occupation has a lower risk of full replacement by AI, software, or robotic systems. Some tasks may be automated or assisted, but the role usually still relies on human judgement, communication, responsibility, physical adaptability, or practical decision-making.
More information on what this score is, and how it is calculated is available here.
Human strengths important in this job
These are human abilities and work contexts that are important in this occupation. They may help explain why parts of the role are harder to replace end-to-end, but they are not the only inputs into the automation score.
Decision-making and problem solving
Very importantWhy this matters
Communicating with people outside the organization
Very importantWhy this matters
Originality
Quite importantWhy this matters
Social perceptiveness
Quite importantWhy this matters
Managing and developing people
Quite importantWhy this matters
Show 4 more strengths
Negotiation
Quite importantWhy this matters
Instructing
Quite importantWhy this matters
Consulting and advising others
Quite importantWhy this matters
Active learning
Quite importantWhy this matters
What users think
Based on 102 votes
Our visitors have voted there's a low chance this occupation will be automated. This assessment is further supported by the calculated automation risk level, which estimates 20% chance of automation.
What do you think the risk of automation is?
What is the likelihood that Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health will be replaced by robots or artificial intelligence within the next 20 years?
Sentiment
Based on user votes over time
View sentiment trend
How opinions have changed over time
Pay & outlook
Wages
In 2024, the median annual wage for Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health was $80,060 ($38 per hour).
The median annual wage for Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health was 61.7% higher than the national median annual wage, which stood at $49,500.
View wage trend
Wages over time
Growth
The number of 'Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health' job openings is expected to rise 4.4% by 2034
View employment trend
Total employment, and estimated job openings
Updated projections are due 09-2025.
Volume
As of 2024 there were 84,930 people employed as 'Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health' within the United States.
This represents around 0.06% of the employed workforce across the country
Put another way, around 1 in 1 thousand people are employed as 'Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health'.
People also viewed
Job description
Conduct research or perform investigation for the purpose of identifying, abating, or eliminating sources of pollutants or hazards that affect either the environment or public health. Using knowledge of various scientific disciplines, may collect, synthesize, study, report, and recommend action based on data derived from measurements or observations of air, food, soil, water, and other sources.
O*NET-SOC code: 19-2041.00
What people are saying (2)
Reply to comment