Remote Sensing Scientists and Technologists

High pay & lowrisk
Minimal Risk
Low High

Explore safer careers (1)

Lower estimated automation risk

Atmospheric and Space Scientists
11% automation risk | Minimal Risk
8.6 pts lower View career
Why it fits

Reuses satellite data, earth systems analysis, sensor interpretation, and scientific reporting.

Alternative careers

Related career paths that build on similar skills and experience

Geographic Information Systems Technologists and Technicians
28% automation risk | Low Risk
Higher growth More jobs
View career
Why it fits

Very direct move using GIS data, imagery, geospatial databases, mapping outputs, and technical documentation.

Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health
20% automation risk | Low Risk
Higher growth More jobs
View career
Why it fits

Applies remote sensing outputs to natural resources, environmental monitoring, compliance, and field validation.

Geodetic Surveyors
25% automation risk | Low Risk
Higher growth More jobs
View career
Why it fits

Builds on satellite, GNSS, LIDAR, large-area measurement, and geospatial analysis knowledge.

Compare this job with others
or search for another job
Share your results with friends and family.

Occupation snapshot

What does this snowflake show?
The Snowflake is a visual summary of the five badges: Automation Risk (calculated), Risk (polled), Growth, Wages and Volume. It gives you an instant snapshot of an occupations profile. The colour of the Snowflake relates to its size. The better the occupation scores in relation to others, the larger and greener the Snowflake becomes.
JOB SCORE
5.6/10
What's this?
Job Score (higher is better):

We rate jobs using four factors. These are:

- Chance of being automated
- Job growth
- Wages
- Volume of available positions

These are some key things to think about when job hunting.

Risk & user votes

Calculated automation risk

20% (Minimal Risk)

Minimal Risk (0-20%): This occupation appears difficult to replace end-to-end with current or near-future automation, including AI software and robotics. Roles in this range usually depend on human judgement, creativity, care, leadership, specialist expertise, or adapting to messy real-world situations. AI and machines may still change parts of the work, but the occupation is likely to remain a distinct human role.

More information on what this score is, and how it is calculated is available here.

Human strengths important in this job

These are human abilities and work contexts that are important in this occupation. They may help explain why parts of the role are harder to replace end-to-end, but they are not the only inputs into the automation score.

Thinking creatively

Very important
Why this matters
Coming up with original ideas and designs—creating new concepts, products, systems, or artistic work. This kind of open-ended invention and taste-based judgment is harder to automate end-to-end than routine, rule-based tasks.
Jobs that also use this strength

Decision-making and problem solving

Very important
Why this matters
Analyze information, weigh tradeoffs, and choose the best solution—especially when situations are ambiguous, high-stakes, or have real-world consequences.
Jobs that also use this strength

Coordinating others’ work

Quite important
Why this matters
Bringing people together, assigning tasks, and keeping a group aligned so work gets done.
Jobs that also use this strength

Coaching and developing others

Quite important
Why this matters
Helps people learn and improve through coaching, mentoring, and feedback. This relies on trust, motivation, and adapting guidance to each person—work that’s hard to replace end-to-end with automation.
Jobs that also use this strength

Communicating with people outside the organization

Quite important
Why this matters
Represents the organization to customers, the public, or government—handling questions, concerns, and relationship-building through conversations, writing, calls, or email.
Jobs that also use this strength
Show 3 more strengths

Developing objectives and strategies

Quite important
Why this matters
Sets long-term goals and chooses strategies and actions to reach them, weighing tradeoffs and adapting plans as conditions change.
Jobs that also use this strength

Active learning

Quite important
Why this matters
Keeps learning from new information and applying it to make better decisions now and in the future, especially when situations change.
Jobs that also use this strength

Operations analysis

Quite important
Why this matters
Figure out what people need and what a product must do, then translate those requirements into a workable design.
Jobs that also use this strength

What users think

Based on 10 votes

What do you think the risk of automation is?

What is the likelihood that Remote Sensing Scientists and Technologists will be replaced by robots or artificial intelligence within the next 20 years?

Pay & outlook

Wages

Very high paid relative to other professions

In 2024, the median annual wage for Physical Scientists, All Other was $117,960 ($57 per hour).

The median annual wage for Physical Scientists, All Other was 138.3% higher than the national median annual wage, which stood at $49,500.

* Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics

Growth

Slow growth relative to other professions.

The number of 'Physical Scientists, All Other' job openings is expected to rise 0.6% by 2034

* Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period between 2023 and 2033
Updated projections are due 09-2025.

Volume

Lower range of job opportunities compared to other professions

As of 2024 there were 22,580 people employed as 'Physical Scientists, All Other' within the United States.

This represents around < 0.001% of the employed workforce across the country

Put another way, around 1 in 6 thousand people are employed as 'Physical Scientists, All Other'.

People also viewed

Computer Programmers Lawyers Mechanical Engineers Accountants and Auditors Graphic Designers

What people are saying (0)

Leave a reply about this occupation
0/8000

Job description

Apply remote sensing principles and methods to analyze data and solve problems in areas such as natural resource management, urban planning, or homeland security. May develop new sensor systems, analytical techniques, or new applications for existing systems.

O*NET-SOC code: 19-2099.01