Explore safer careers (5)
Lower estimated automation risk
Why it fits
Transfers molecular processes, lab experiments, analytical methods, literature, grants, data interpretation, and writing.
Why it fits
Fits experienced faculty leading research staff, grants, budgets, protocols, publications, and scientific programs.
Why it fits
Uses microbes, lab methods, contamination control, experimental design, data analysis, safety, and publication skills.
Why it fits
Applies biomedical questions, protocols, disease mechanisms, evidence review, data analysis, publications, and research ethics.
Why it fits
Applies cell biology, molecular methods, assays, microscopy, experimental controls, literature, and scientific reporting.
Occupation snapshot
What does this snowflake show?
What's this?
We rate jobs using four factors. These are:
- Chance of being automated
- Job growth
- Wages
- Volume of available positions
These are some key things to think about when job hunting.
Risk & user votes
Calculated automation risk
Minimal Risk (0-20%): This occupation appears difficult to replace end-to-end with current or near-future automation, including AI software and robotics. Roles in this range usually depend on human judgement, creativity, care, leadership, specialist expertise, or adapting to messy real-world situations. AI and machines may still change parts of the work, but the occupation is likely to remain a distinct human role.
More information on what this score is, and how it is calculated is available here.
Human strengths important in this job
These are human abilities and work contexts that are important in this occupation. They may help explain why parts of the role are harder to replace end-to-end, but they are not the only inputs into the automation score.
Thinking creatively
Very importantWhy this matters
Decision-making and problem solving
Very importantWhy this matters
Instructing
Very importantWhy this matters
Developing objectives and strategies
Very importantWhy this matters
Active learning
Very importantWhy this matters
Show 3 more strengths
Social perceptiveness
Quite importantWhy this matters
Coordinating others’ work
Quite importantWhy this matters
Communicating with people outside the organization
Quite importantWhy this matters
What users think
Based on 55 votes
Our visitors have voted there's a low chance this occupation will be automated. This assessment is further supported by the calculated automation risk level, which estimates 18% chance of automation.
What do you think the risk of automation is?
What is the likelihood that Biological Science Teachers, Postsecondary will be replaced by robots or artificial intelligence within the next 20 years?
Sentiment
Based on user votes over time
View sentiment trend
How opinions have changed over time
Pay & outlook
Wages
In 2024, the median annual wage for Biological Science Teachers, Postsecondary was $83,460 ($40 per hour).
The median annual wage for Biological Science Teachers, Postsecondary was 68.6% higher than the national median annual wage, which stood at $49,500.
View wage trend
Wages over time
Growth
The number of 'Biological Science Teachers, Postsecondary' job openings is expected to rise 7.3% by 2034
View employment trend
Total employment, and estimated job openings
Updated projections are due 09-2025.
Volume
As of 2024 there were 53,250 people employed as 'Biological Science Teachers, Postsecondary' within the United States.
This represents around < 0.001% of the employed workforce across the country
Put another way, around 1 in 2 thousand people are employed as 'Biological Science Teachers, Postsecondary'.
People also viewed
Job description
Teach courses in biological sciences. Includes both teachers primarily engaged in teaching and those who do a combination of teaching and research.
O*NET-SOC code: 25-1042.00
What people are saying (2)
s own or others
Reply to comment