Locomotive Engineers
Explore safer careers (5)
Lower estimated automation risk
Why it fits
Fits senior operators using transportation safety, schedules, disruptions, crews, service metrics, and regulatory coordination.
Why it fits
Fits experienced rail operators using schedules, safety rules, crew coaching, equipment readiness, reports, and service recovery.
Why it fits
Applies safety rules, equipment inspection habits, compliance judgment, records, incident awareness, and regulatory procedures.
Why it fits
Applies train orders, railroad rules, crew communication, switching plans, safety checks, schedules, and incident records.
Why it fits
Transfers freight movement knowledge, schedules, routing, carrier paperwork, customer updates, and rail operations context.
Occupation snapshot
What does this snowflake show?
What's this?
We rate jobs using four factors. These are:
- Chance of being automated
- Job growth
- Wages
- Volume of available positions
These are some key things to think about when job hunting.
Risk & user votes
Calculated automation risk
High Risk (61-80%): This occupation shows a significant risk of end-to-end replacement by automation. Many core parts of the role may be structured, repeatable, software-driven, or physically predictable enough for AI, machines, or robotic systems to take over. If you work in this area, it may be worth exploring safer related careers or moving towards more human-centred responsibilities.
More information on what this score is, and how it is calculated is available here.
Human strengths important in this job
These are human abilities and work contexts that are important in this occupation. They may help explain why parts of the role are harder to replace end-to-end, but they are not the only inputs into the automation score.
Decision-making and problem solving
Quite importantWhy this matters
Coordinating others’ work
Quite importantWhy this matters
Active learning
Quite importantWhy this matters
Education and training expertise
Quite importantWhy this matters
What users think
Based on 190 votes
Our visitors have voted they are unsure if this occupation will be automated. However, the automation risk level we have generated suggests a much higher chance of automation: 69% chance of automation.
What do you think the risk of automation is?
What is the likelihood that Locomotive Engineers will be replaced by robots or artificial intelligence within the next 20 years?
Sentiment
Based on user votes over time
View sentiment trend
How opinions have changed over time
Pay & outlook
Wages
In 2024, the median annual wage for Locomotive Engineers was $77,400 ($37 per hour).
The median annual wage for Locomotive Engineers was 56.4% higher than the national median annual wage, which stood at $49,500.
View wage trend
Wages over time
Growth
The number of 'Locomotive Engineers' job openings is expected to rise 0.7% by 2034
View employment trend
Total employment, and estimated job openings
Updated projections are due 09-2025.
Volume
As of 2024 there were 31,990 people employed as 'Locomotive Engineers' within the United States.
This represents around < 0.001% of the employed workforce across the country
Put another way, around 1 in 4 thousand people are employed as 'Locomotive Engineers'.
People also viewed
Job description
Drive electric, diesel-electric, steam, or gas-turbine-electric locomotives to transport passengers or freight. Interpret train orders, electronic or manual signals, and railroad rules and regulations.
O*NET-SOC code: 53-4011.00
What people are saying (15)
I live in a major metropolitan area, and there's a train/road crossing with signs warning of automated trains being in use there. Computers won't have to "learn" the different types of signals and rules, as they will be programmed in by (fallible) humans.
There is/has been a lawsuit by a bunch of families of British servicemen and servicewomen who were killed in CH-47 helicopter crashes in which those helos had been converted to FADEC (they still had human pilots). The lawsuit blames the crashes on failure of the computerized throttle controls. (With FADEC, by design, the computer overrules the pilots' inputs to the throttle controls.)
So, with money as the driving force, *some* sort of computerized trains will be deployed. And likely, there will be some failures in which people die, because the computerized systems are created by fallible humans.
Reply to comment